GET THE APP

ABUNDANCE OF NARROW-CLAWED CRAYFISHES (Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823) AND ITS TRENDS IN LAKE SEVAN, ARMENIA | Abstract
Card image

ABUNDANCE OF NARROW-CLAWED CRAYFISHES (Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823) AND ITS TRENDS IN LAKE SEVAN, ARMENIA

Google scholar citation report
Citations : 336

Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research received 336 citations as per google scholar report

Journal of Aquaculture Engineering and Fisheries Research peer review process verified at publons
Indexed In
  • Index Copernicus
  • Google Scholar
  • Sherpa Romeo
  • The Global Impact Factor (GIF)
  • Zoological Records
  • SciLit - Scientific Literature
  • Euro Pub
Recommended Conferences
Social

Abstract

Karen AGHABABYAN, Gurgen KHANAMIRIAN, Evelina GHUKASYAN, Norik BADALYAN

The narrow-clawed crayfish (Astacus leptodactylus Eschscholtz, 1823) is an indigenous species in Arme-nia. In 1980s it was occasionally introduced in Lake Sevan where its population started to grow. There is a large scale fishery of the crayfish in the Lake, as its demand remains high. Industrial stock of crayfishes at the Lake monitored annually, shows statistically sig-nificant decline in the 2004-2011 period. This decline can be described by logarithmic model y = -577.5ln(x) + 2158, F = 50.27, P<0.001. The catch rate of crayfish net-boxes also shows logarithmic decline F = 9.27, P<0.05 in the 2004-2011 period. Since the net boxes are designed to catch the larger size crayfishes only, the decline indicates a decrease of average size among crayfish population. The female fertility does not show statistically significant correlation with the in-dustrial stock of crayfish. It does, however, show neg-ative correlation with the catch rate of the net boxes: rPearson = -0.686, P<0.05; ρSpearman = -0.647, P<0.05. The correlation can be explained as the big animals are actively removed through harvesting, while small-er animals are not captured; meanwhile the remaining smaller animals produce fewer eggs. Decline of cray-fish stock cannot be explained by diseases and inva-sive species, but can be explained by overharvesting. Continuation of harvesting aimed at supplying the ex-isting demand might result to population decline of more than 70% during next 17 years.

Share this article